Ignoring The Obvious: Swine Vaccines Gone Bad?
20 Jan 2022
By now the evidence is fairly clear and compelling: that the COVID-19 virus was engineered in a laboratory for the express purpose of being a vaccine – against other viruses – specifically, swine coronaviruses in China. In my opinion, it most likely wasn’t meant to – or thought to – be able to jump to humans with such ferocity. As I’ve stated repeatedly, focusing on the “biowarfare” aspects such as the deliberate-vs-accidental release, or which labs created it, or who funded it, etc., are all valid considerations to investigate yet they obscure the main point: this “novel” coronavirus was built to be a vaccine for China’s pork industry.
I have been writing about the swine-COVID connection for over a year and a half. I’ve read every bit of the purported “origin” investigations from the WHO, CDC, Congress (both sides), the President’s, and even China’s official investigations. I’ve also included over the year as much research from online open-sources of intel as I could find. Bottom line that I’ve discovered was, that literally none of them have even mentioned swine vaccines, swine coronavirus origins, or the four swine epidemics that sequentially hit China from 2016-2019 and almost decimated China’s pork production – over 50 percent that China officially admitted which other sources can almost guarantee that the number of infected and culled pigs was closer to 80 percent or higher. For a nation whose populace gets over 50 percent of its daily protein from pork and pork products, that dataset alone should have been, as they say in the intel-analysis business, “front and center” to which all other datasets would need a vector. Nobody has even mentioned that dataset… yet.
I don’t think the powers that be will be able to hide the swine-COVID connections much longer.
The recent release of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) documents from Project Veritas, and the earlier release last year from The Gateway Pundit, both matched the origins of the COVID-19 virus as coming from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Furthermore, these DARPA documents even went as far as codifying the acronym of the COVID-19 virus from “SARS-CoV-2” to simply “SARSr-CoV-WIV” explicitly meaning that it came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. An excerpt from that DARPA’s report to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, dated 13 Aug 2021: (with emphasis)
“2. SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSr-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone. It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. (sic) The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019.”
Note: apparently not even DARPA’s investigators could figure out for what purpose a bat vaccine was being engineered that could not infect bats. Yet are we to believe that the entire purpose of a swine coronavirus disease vaccine being engineered has simply been ignored? If
so, why? Not even the Chinese ignored that vector. They couldn’t. Here is just one scientific research document listed at the peer-reviewed online list for Science Direct at elsevier.com:
Swine enteric alphacoronavirus (swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus): An update three years after its discovery (2020)
Yong-Le Yang, Jia-Qi Yu, Yao-Wei Huang*
Key Laboratory of Animal Virology of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310058, China
“7. Conclusion
As early as 2004, the HKU2-related Rhinolophus bat CoV was identified (Lau et al., 2007), and the first outbreak of acute diarrhea caused by SeACoV in pigs appeared in 2017 (Pan et al., 2017). Although the virus reemerged in Fujian in 2018 and Guangdong in 2019, there have not been large-scale losses reported, which is positive news for its
prevention and control. However, it is strange that SeACoV has not resulted in a large-scale epidemic in the pig industry in Guangdong in recent years, similar to the way SARS-CoV emerged in 2003 and then basically disappeared (Ksiazek et al., 2003) until the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2019 (Zhou et al., 2020).
This outbreak of the novel SARS-CoV-2 and current pandemic also requires strict control to ensure the health of people around the world. Since all CoVs have the capability for recombination, no CoV epidemic can be taken lightly, even those in pigs (Opriessnig and Huang, 2020). To prevent future outbreaks, unified detection methods are needed to establish better surveillance of SeACoV, including virological and serological methods.
More research is needed to understand the infectious properties of SeACoV and HKU2-related CoVs, especially given their broad ability to infect cell lines from various animal origins (Yang et al., 2019b). The presumed name “SADS-CoV” may not be appropriate since the available pathogenicity studies have not provided strong evidence of high virulence. The reverse genetic system for SeACoV has been established successfully in our lab (Yang et al., 2019a), which will facilitate future studies exploring the molecular mechanisms of SeACoV replication and pathogenicity. With the structural analysis of SeACoV and HKU2 S glycoproteins, it is also important to identify the primary receptor and study the mechanism of receptor binding. It is clear now more than ever that CoV-induced diseases not only pose a huge threat to the pig industry but also to human health. If HKU2-related CoVs emerge again, causing unknown damage to the pig industry, such basic research on SeACoV will be necessary to prevent and control future epidemics.”
The Chinese themselves had to admit the obvious swine-human connection aspect of COVID-19 while very conveniently leaving out any reference to the Drs. Frankenstein-Moreau-type chimeric viral tinkering that they themselves were involved with at their own WIV. The same WIV that created the “live vaccine” that DARPA confirmed, yet without any guess as to what was being vaccinated against… The Chinese even added thoughtful graphics to their report. Such as:
But hey, what is wrong with that graphic? Oh! I know… so… I fixed it:
Remember what I said a year ago, that… It came from pigs. Whether it was an accidental leak or not, and from which Chinese lab it came, doesn’t change the data on its origin. Any investigation of COVID-19 origins may or may not ever see the light of day if one focuses only on the bio-weapon/accident vs. deliberate/targeted aspect of it. What is far more important, and with wider ranging implications, is to understand the overwhelming evidence that this novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 was in fact engineered in laboratories using yet another coronavirus which came from the rufous horseshoe bat in Guangdong province China.
Because now we know that the COVID-19 virus was engineered as a live vaccine for pigs against other swine diseases. If scientists were going to select a bat coronavirus to use as a vaccine against other viruses, one would hope they use one that they thought couldn’t infect humans, at least not virulently. And, most importantly, of the over 700 bat coronaviruses isolated in China there are only a few which have been known to either infect humans or have the ability to infect humans: the coronavirus which caused the SARS-COV-1 human outbreak in 2002-2004; the MERS-COV outbreak of 2012; the SADS-COV swine outbreak in China in 2016-2018; and the current SARS-COV-2 pandemic. So far, the other bat coronaviruses have not been detected in humans – that we know.
From the 5 April 2018 online review of The National Hog Farmer:
“Scientists confirmed the connection of SADS-CoV to bats by identifying the new virus in the small intestine of piglets from the outbreak. They determined the genetic sequence of SADS-CoV is like that of a bat coronavirus discovered in 2007 and looked for evidence of SADS-CoV in bat specimens collected from 2013 to 2016 in Guangdong Province. It shares 95% of its genetic code with another coronavirus, HKU2, detected in cave-dwelling horseshoe bats.
“Interestingly, the research team found striking similarities between SADS-CoV and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)– a highly infectious virus that killed humans in China in 2002 and 2003- in geographical, temporal, ecological and etiological settings. SADS-CoV came from horseshoe bats in a region near the origin of SARS.
So, if they were tinkering with a swine coronavirus, and I believe they were, and posted about just that in May 2020, and now we have discovered that the SADS-COV pig virus can indeed infect humans, both intestinal and lung tissues, we can see how easily it explains the origin of the SARS-COV-2 and how it came into being. The “why” isn’t as important as the “how” and “when”. Even if bat-swine-human pretty much completes the etiology in question, any pandemic being spawned by human engineering should be of the utmost importance and at the highest levels of concern.
In my opinion, pigs are the intermediary of COVID-19 that all of science has been ignoring, with dreadful results. For the remaining purposes of this blog, I will refrain from adding the (mostly bogus) distinction between alpha- and beta-coronaviruses.
Some of the clearest examples of swine-COVID-19 nexus isn’t just the 14 pig labs in and around Wuhan COVID-19 outbreak noted above. The same type of COVID-19 outbreak mapping shows that in both Brazil and Italy the largest concentration of COVID-19 cases were almost directly on top of those countries’ highest pork production areas. In Brazil, over half their cases centered directly near their major (60 percent) pork production areas in the Santa Catarina region. In Italy, the profound correlation to their pork industry (over 70 percent of Italian pork comes from Lombardy) in just three northern provinces, mostly Lombardy, Veneto, and Trento-Tyrol, are where the overwhelming abundance of COVID-19 cases are confirmed.
Here is a compilation of Maps 1, 2, and 3 showing the COVID-19 and pork producing areas of Brazil compiled by Dr. Immo Fiebrig, Professor Dr. Larissa Bombardi, and Dr. Pablo Nepomuceno.
Scientists see epidemiological connection between Covid-19 and pigs in Brazil
In northern Italy the correlation is even more striking. From Wikipedia the northern provinces of Lombardy, Veneto, and Trento-Tyrol (also called Trentino-Alto) made up the majority of COVID-19 cases. That Lombardy alone accounts for 70 percent of all Italian pork production should definitely sound alarms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Italy
But these are just a few of the many swine-COVID-19 correlations. Most of these incidents of bat-pig-human contagions very quickly are ignored by the media and apparently government and health officials as well. Sometimes media and officials seemed to go out of their way to dismiss any correlation at all. Here is just a partial listing of meat packing companies (not just pork) that were forced to close plants in the US:
Chinese-owned Smithfield Foods, Sanderson Farms, Tyson Foods, Maple Leaf Foods, Cargill, West Liberty Foods, and Brazilian-owned JBS have also closed some plants after employees or local residents were confirmed to have COVID-19. The April 2020 Sioux Falls South Dakota Smithfield Foods pork plant had the largest COVID-19 outbreak at that time.
Oh, and by the way, did you know that China tried to smuggle a million pounds of African Swine Fever infected pork into the US back in 2019? They were caught in New Jersey because of the smell. The infected pork was disguised in Tide laundry detergent boxes and ramen noodle packages. None of it was refrigerated. It was all incinerated by US Customs. https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/1-million-pounds-of-pork-seized-at-u-s-border-amid-deadly-chinese-outbreak 17 March 2019
Now, why would China do that? More importantly, what if we caught them, but Brazil and Italy didn’t?
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-race-to-build-vaccine-for-african-swine-fever--66034 June 2019
“They (the Chinese) are under so much pressure to do something that they might start using a vaccine before it’s been tested enough to make sure that it’s safe,” says Pfeiffer. (Professor and Director of Royal Veterinary College, University of London)
https://www.thehealthsite.com/news/swine-coronavirus-are-we-staring-at-another-pandemic-similar-to-covid-19-773194/ 15 Oct 2020
“This study suggests humans may be susceptible to spillover of SADS-CoV. Researchers tested several types of cells by infecting them with a synthetic form of SADS-CoV to understand just how high the risk of cross-species contamination could be.”
https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/swine-%CE%B1-coronavirus-jumping-to-humans-how-likely-is-it-2dacc599050 Oct 14, 2020 by Shin Jie Yong, Malaysia
• SADS-CoV replicated efficiently in both pig and human cells cultured from the lungs, liver, stomach, and intestines. Specifically, all sorts of human lung cells — including microvascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and nasal and airway epithelial cells — were prone to SADS-CoV infection.
• To discern if humans have any existing immunity against SADS-CoV, the study exposed human cells to common cold-causing coronaviruses. And then check if the antibodies generated could cross-neutralize SADS-CoV. It did not, which suggests no existing immunity.
• Remdesivir — an antiviral to treat Covid-19 — stopped the replication of SADS-CoV in human cells. Indeed, remdesivir restrains RNA polymerase — an enzyme RNA viruses (like coronaviruses) use to make their genes.
• SADS-CoV could still infect cells despite blocking the common receptors coronaviruses exploit — i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2; for SARS-CoVs), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DDP4; for MERS-CoV), and aminopeptidase N (APN; for other swine coronaviruses). “These data suggest that SADS-CoV does not use any of these known coronavirus receptors for docking and entry into human cells,” stated the authors.
• SADS-CoV could not replicate properly in mice. “We noted little, if any, evidence of reproducible or robust virus replication in the liver, spleen, or various sections of the intestine,” the researchers wrote. This result is expected since mice are poor animal models of coronaviruses.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-10/uonc-scr101320.php
14 Oct 2020 UNC Chapel Hill News Release
“The Baric lab worked with Caitlin Edwards, a research specialist and master of public health student at UNC-Chapel Hill, on the study which suggests humans may be susceptible to spillover of SADS-CoV.
Edwards, the study's first author, tested several types of cells by infecting them with a synthetic form of SADS-CoV to understand just how high the risk of cross-species contamination could be. Evidence from the study indicates that a wide range of mammalian cells, including primary human lung and intestinal cells, are susceptible to infection. According to Edwards, SADS-CoV shows a higher rate of growth in intestinal cells found in the human gut, unlike SARS-CoV-2, which primarily infects lung cells.”
https://www.organicconsumers.org/blog/gain-function-ghouls-sars-cov-2-isnt-scariest-thing-could-leak-lab
“If it turns out that SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a lab, it is likely that Baric and his colleagues Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance will be implicated in its creation. Even dissident Chinese virologist Li-Meng Yan’s allegation that SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon intentionally released by the Chinese government relies heavily on Shi’s work, which can’t be separated from her collaborations with Baric and Daszak. “
https://www.rebelnews.com/new_form_of_african_swine_fever_identified_in_chinese_pig_farms_likely_caused_by_illegal_vaccines 22 Jan 2021
“A new form of African swine fever has been identified in Chinese pig farms. According to Reuters, industry insiders say that the disease was most likely caused by illegal vaccines, and serves as a fresh blow to the nation where the COVID-19 coronavirus was first identified. China is the world’s largest producer of pork.”
What the hell is an “illegal vaccine” anyway? And why would it be illegal to use on pigs? I think we know the answer already. COVID-19 was a swine vaccine gone bad.
Your wingman,
reeko
Have you read any of Dan Sirotkin's work?
https://harvard2thebighouse.substack.com/p/understanding-covid-19-and-seasonal https://harvard2thebighouse.substack.com/p/burn-the-ivory-towers-to-the-ground